↓ Skip to main content

Identifying flaws in the GWAS datasets of a published Mendelian randomization study: complementary re-evaluation and suggestion for analytical refinements

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying flaws in the GWAS datasets of a published Mendelian randomization study: complementary re-evaluation and suggestion for analytical refinements
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2024
DOI 10.1186/s12967-024-05106-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia-Cheng Xiang, Yi-Fan Xiong, Shao-Gang Wang, Qi-Dong Xia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#22,955,183
of 25,597,324 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,915
of 4,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,517
of 166,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#43
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,597,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.