You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis of proposed supervised injection facilities in Montreal, Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1747-597x-8-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ehsan Jozaghi, Andrew A Reid, Martin A Andresen |
| Abstract |
This paper will determine whether expanding Insite (North America's first and only supervised injection facility) to more locations in Canada such as Montreal, cost less than the health care consequences of not having such expanded programs for injection drug users. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 77% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 22% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,055,214
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#45
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,613
of 206,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.