You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient-centered disease management (PCDM) for heart failure: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2261-13-49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David B Bekelman, Mary E Plomondon, Mark D Sullivan, Karin Nelson, Brack Hattler, Connor McBryde, Kenneth G Lehmann, Jonathan Potfay, Paul Heidenreich, John S Rumsfeld |
| Abstract |
Chronic heart failure (HF) disease management programs have reported inconsistent results and have not included comorbid depression management or specifically focused on improving patient-reported outcomes. The Patient Centered Disease Management (PCDM) trial was designed to test the effectiveness of collaborative care disease management in improving health status (symptoms, functioning, and quality of life) in patients with HF who reported poor HF-specific health status. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| India | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 202 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 11% |
| Psychology | 15 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,475,442
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#577
of 1,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,614
of 194,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.