You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Needs assessment for direct ophthalmoscopy training in neurology residency
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12909-024-05280-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jasmeet Saroya, Noor Chahal, Alice Jiang, Douglas Pet, Nailyn Rasool, Mark Terrelonge, Madeline Yung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 33% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 67% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,892,170
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#839
of 4,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,122
of 166,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#9
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.