You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Communicating the results of risk-based breast cancer screening through visualizations of risk: a participatory design approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-024-02483-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Inge S. van Strien-Knippenberg, Hannah Arjangi-Babetti, Danielle R. M. Timmermans, Laura Schrauwen, Mirjam P. Fransen, Marijke Melles, Olga C. Damman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 40% |
| Psychology | 1 | 20% |
| Design | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,698,379
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#567
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,224
of 233,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.