↓ Skip to main content

Predictive risk modelling in the Spanish population: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictive risk modelling in the Spanish population: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan F Orueta, Roberto Nuño-Solinis, Maider Mateos, Itziar Vergara, Gonzalo Grandes, Santiago Esnaola

Abstract

An increase in chronic conditions is currently the greatest threat to human health and to the sustainability of health systems. Risk adjustment systems may enable population stratification programmes to be developed and become instrumental in implementing new models of care.The objectives of this study are to evaluate the capability of ACG-PM, DCG-HCC and CRG-based models to predict healthcare costs and identify patients that will be high consumers and to analyse changes to predictive capacity when socio-economic variables are added.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 23%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Other 7 8%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 7%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,799,076
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,261
of 8,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,291
of 197,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#19
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.