↓ Skip to main content

A randomized placebo-controlled phase II study of a Pseudomonas vaccine in ventilated ICU patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
56 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized placebo-controlled phase II study of a Pseudomonas vaccine in ventilated ICU patients
Published in
Critical Care, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1601-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordi Rello, Claus-Georg Krenn, Gottfried Locker, Ernst Pilger, Christian Madl, Laura Balica, Thierry Dugernier, Pierre-Francois Laterre, Herbert Spapen, Pieter Depuydt, Jean-Louis Vincent, Lajos Bogár, Zsuzsanna Szabó, Barbara Völgyes, Rafael Máñez, Nahit Cakar, Atilla Ramazanoglu, Arzu Topeli, Maria A. Mastruzzo, Abel Jasovich, Christian G. Remolif, Liliana del Carmen Soria, Max A. Andresen Hernandez, Carolina Ruiz Balart, Ildikó Krémer, Zsolt Molnár, Frank von Sonnenburg, Arthur Lyons, Michael Joannidis, Heinz Burgmann, Tobias Welte, Anton Klingler, Romana Hochreiter, Kerstin Westritschnig

Abstract

Currently, no vaccine against Pseudomonas is available. IC43 is a new, recombinant, protein (OprF/I)-based vaccine against the opportunistic pathogen, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a major cause of serious hospital-acquired infections. IC43 has proven immunogenicity and tolerability in healthy volunteers, patients with burns, and patients with chronic lung diseases. In order to assess the immunogenicity and safety of IC43 in patients who are most at risk of acquiring Pseudomonas infections, it was evaluated in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, partially blinded study in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. The immunogenicity of IC43 at day 14 was determined as the primary endpoint, and safety, efficacy against P. aeruginosa infections, and all-cause mortality were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Vaccinations (100 μg or 200 μg IC43 with adjuvant, or 100 μg IC43 without adjuvant, or placebo) were given twice in a 7-day interval and patients were followed up for 90 days. Higher OprF/I IgG antibody titers were seen at day 14 for all IC43 groups versus placebo (P < 0.0001). Seroconversion (≥4-fold increase in OprF/I IgG titer from days 0 to 14) was highest with 100 μg IC43 without adjuvant (80.6%). There were no significant differences in P. aeruginosa infection rates, with a low rate of invasive infections (pneumonia or bacteremia) in the IC43 groups (11.2-14.0%). Serious adverse events (SAEs) considered possibly related to therapy were reported by 2 patients (1.9%) in the group of 100 µg IC43 with adjuvant. Both SAEs resolved and no deaths were related to study treatment. Local tolerability symptoms were mild and rare (<5% of patients), a low rate of treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (3.1-10.6%) was observed in the IC43 groups. This phase II study has shown that IC43 vaccination of ventilated ICU patients produced a significant immunogenic effect. P. aeruginosa infection rates did not differ significantly between groups. In the absence of any difference in immune response following administration of 100 μg IC43 without adjuvant compared with 200 μg IC43 with adjuvant, the 100 μg dose without adjuvant was considered for further testing of its possible benefit of improved outcomes. There were no safety or mortality concerns. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00876252 . Registered on 3 April 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 132 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 50 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,210,925
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,013
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,823
of 425,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#16
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.