↓ Skip to main content

Clinical efficiency of three-port inflatable robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in mediastinal tumor resection

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical efficiency of three-port inflatable robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in mediastinal tumor resection
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, March 2024
DOI 10.1186/s12957-024-03357-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hao Peng, YuanPeng He, Siqi Sheng, Maierhaba Maitiyasen, Jingfeng Li, Yvxuan Liu, Jing Chen, Xinyu Hou, Haizhu Song, Jun Yi

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,837,009
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#190
of 2,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,029
of 182,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them