↓ Skip to main content

How to proceed when evidence-based practice is required but very little evidence available?

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to proceed when evidence-based practice is required but very little evidence available?
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-709x-21-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Olivier Lanlo, Bruce F Walker

Abstract

All clinicians of today know that scientific evidence is the base on which clinical practice should rest. However, this is not always easy, in particular in those disciplines, where the evidence is scarce. Although the last decades have brought an impressive production of research that is of interest to chiropractors, there are still many areas such as diagnosis, prognosis, choice of treatment, and management that have not been subjected to extensive scrutiny.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 33%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 20%
Sports and Recreations 4 7%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 7 13%