You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Breakfast: a multidisciplinary approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Italian Journal of Pediatrics, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1824-7288-39-44 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Affinita, Loredana Catalani, Giovanna Cecchetto, Gianfranco De Lorenzo, Dario Dilillo, Giorgio Donegani, Lucia Fransos, Fabio Lucidi, Chiara Mameli, Elisa Manna, Paolo Marconi, Giuseppe Mele, Laura Minestroni, Massimo Montanari, Mario Morcellini, Giuseppe Rovera, Giuseppe Rotilio, Marco Sachet, Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti |
| Abstract |
The role of breakfast as an essential part of an healthy diet has been only recently promoted even if breakfast practices were known since the Middle Age. The growing scientific evidences on this topic are extremely sector-based nevertheless breakfast could be regarded from different point of views and from different expertises. This approach, that take into account history, sociology, anthropology, medicine, psychology and pedagogy, is useful to better understand the value of this meal in our culture. The aim of this paper was to analyse breakfast-related issues based on a multidisciplinary approach with input by specialists from different fields of learning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 37 | 28% |
| United States | 16 | 12% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 53 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 79 | 60% |
| Scientists | 24 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 65 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#258,888
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#7
of 1,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,665
of 207,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.