↓ Skip to main content

Investigating the validation of the Chinese Mandarin version of the Social Responsiveness Scale in a Mainland China child population

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating the validation of the Chinese Mandarin version of the Social Responsiveness Scale in a Mainland China child population
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-1185-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao-Qun Cen, Ya-Yong Liang, Qiu-Ru Chen, Kai-Yun Chen, Hong-Zhu Deng, Bi-Yuan Chen, Xiao-Bing Zou

Abstract

Researchers from several different countries have found the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) to have good psychometric properties. However, to our knowledge, no studies on this subject have been reported in Mainland China. In this study, we investigated the psychometric properties of the Chinese Mandarin version of the SRS when used in Mainland China. The reliability and validity of the parent-report SRS in a sample of 749 children of 4- to 14-year-olds: 411 typically developing and 338 clinical participants (202 with autism spectrum disorder (ASD)) were examined. Internal consistency for total scale (0.871-0.922), test-retest reliability (0.81-0.94), and convergent validity with the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) (0.302-0.647) were satisfactory. The SRS total score discriminated between the ASD and other developmental disorders. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses revealed that the SRS was predicted to accurately classify 69.2-97.2% of youth ASD. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) supported a single-factor solution for the ASD subsample. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not confirm the theoretical construct of five factors model with inadequate fit in the ASD subsample. Overall, our findings supported the reliability and validity of the parent-report SRS as one ASD screening instrument. In addition, we also suggest that the use of separate cut-offs for screening purposes (optimizing sensitivity) vs. clinical confirmation (optimizing specificity) should be considered.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 31 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 33 31%