↓ Skip to main content

Parasite responses to pollution: what we know and where we go in ‘Environmental Parasitology’

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
239 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parasite responses to pollution: what we know and where we go in ‘Environmental Parasitology’
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2001-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernd Sures, Milen Nachev, Christian Selbach, David J. Marcogliese

Abstract

Environmental parasitology deals with the interactions between parasites and pollutants in the environment. Their sensitivity to pollutants and environmental disturbances makes many parasite taxa useful indicators of environmental health and anthropogenic impact. Over the last 20 years, three main research directions have been shown to be highly promising and relevant, namely parasites as accumulation indicators for selected pollutants, parasites as effect indicators, and the role of parasites interacting with established bioindicators. The current paper focuses on the potential use of parasites as indicators of environmental pollution and the interactions with their hosts. By reviewing some of the most recent findings in the field of environmental parasitology, we summarize the current state of the art and try to identify promising ideas for future research directions. In detail, we address the suitability of parasites as accumulation indicators and their possible application to demonstrate biological availability of pollutants; the role of parasites as pollutant sinks; the interaction between parasites and biomarkers focusing on combined effects of parasitism and pollution on the health of their hosts; and the use of parasites as indicators of contaminants and ecosystem health. Therefore, this review highlights the application of parasites as indicators at different biological scales, from the organismal to the ecosystem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 377 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 21%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 95 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 128 34%
Environmental Science 68 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 2%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 106 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,810,547
of 25,238,182 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,417
of 5,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,340
of 431,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#30
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,238,182 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.