↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of hairpin RNA transgene-induced gene silencing in Fusarium oxysporum

Overview of attention for article published in Silence, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of hairpin RNA transgene-induced gene silencing in Fusarium oxysporum
Published in
Silence, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1758-907x-4-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulrike Schumann, Neil A Smith, Kemal Kazan, Michael Ayliffe, Ming-Bo Wang

Abstract

Hairpin RNA (hpRNA) transgenes can be effective at inducing RNA silencing and have been exploited as a powerful tool for gene function analysis in many organisms. However, in fungi, expression of hairpin RNA transcripts can induce post-transcriptional gene silencing, but in some species can also lead to transcriptional gene silencing, suggesting a more complex interplay of the two pathways at least in some fungi. Because many fungal species are important pathogens, RNA silencing is a powerful technique to understand gene function, particularly when gene knockouts are difficult to obtain. We investigated whether the plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum possesses a functional gene silencing machinery and whether hairpin RNA transcripts can be employed to effectively induce gene silencing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
India 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 33%
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,711
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Silence
#25
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,887
of 194,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Silence
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them