↓ Skip to main content

Chiropractic management of post spinal cord stimulator spine pain: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chiropractic management of post spinal cord stimulator spine pain: a case report
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12998-017-0136-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel M. Perrucci, Christopher M. Coulis

Abstract

A brief overview of failed back surgery syndrome, with emphasis on low back pain status post spinal cord stimulation, and post-surgical spinal manipulation is presented. Four cases of patients within the VA Connecticut Health Care System presenting between July 2014 and July 2015 reporting low back pain after surgical insertion of spinal cord stimulators are discussed. This study describes the outcomes experienced by four patients with low back pain status post implanted spinal cord stimulators receiving manual therapy in the form of lumbar spine manipulation or mobilization. All four patients denied adverse effects to spinal manipulation/mobilization and onset of new symptoms after treatment; two patients reported durable reduction in low back pain with increased tolerance to walking, standing, or lying down, one reported temporary relief of low back pain, and one reported no change in symptoms. Further investigation is needed to determine the benefit of spinal manipulation in patients with implanted spinal cord stimulators, but this study has shown the absence of adverse effects from manipulation or mobilization treatment, in regards to SCS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Unspecified 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 11 31%