↓ Skip to main content

Higher skeletal muscle mass may protect against ischemic stroke in community-dwelling adults without stroke and dementia: The PRESENT project

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Higher skeletal muscle mass may protect against ischemic stroke in community-dwelling adults without stroke and dementia: The PRESENT project
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12877-017-0433-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang-Ki Minn, Seung-Han Suk

Abstract

It is well known that a low skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is associated with stroke. However, it is unknown whether increasing muscle mass can prevent stroke. This community-based cross-sectional study was supported by the regional government. SMM measurements and brain computed tomography was performed in 722 stroke-free and dementia-free subjects (aged 50-75 years). Subjects were divided into quartiles (Q) by SMM, checked using the bioelectrical impedance analysis method (InBody 770, InBody, Seoul, Korea). Odds ratios (ORs) of brain white matter changes/silent infarction (WMC/SI) were calculated. The subjects were then divided into two groups by sex and evaluated. In the analysis of the four groups, the unadjusted ORs of Q2-Q4 were 0.616 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.372-1.022; P = 0.061), 0.290 (CI, 0.159-0.530; P < 0.001), and 0.209 (CI, 0.108-0.403; P < 0.001) for the risk of WMC/SI. Adjusted ORs for age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, education, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking were 0.994 (CI, 0.513-1.740; P = 0.085), 0.669 (CI, 0.329-1.362; P = 0.268), and 0.464 (CI, 0.219-0.984; P = 0.045). In the two-group (dichotomized) analysis, the unadjusted OR for the higher muscle mass groups (Q3 + Q4) was 0.313 (CI, 0.200-0.491; P < 0.001). The adjusted OR was 0.577 (CI, 0.340-0.979; P = 0.042). Considering sex, the adjusted OR were 0.351 (CI, 0.141-0.869; P = 0.024) in men and 0.771 (CI, 0.391-1.519; P = 0.452) in women. Our findings suggest that increased SMM may protect against WMC/SI, especially in men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Other 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 28 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 32 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,906,275
of 24,135,931 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,289
of 3,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,499
of 427,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#45
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,135,931 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.