↓ Skip to main content

It’s plain and simple: transparency is good for science and in the public interest

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
It’s plain and simple: transparency is good for science and in the public interest
Published in
Trials, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Denegri, Helene Faure

Abstract

In the past couple of years, there has been a growing focus on the need to make scientific output accessible to a greater number of people, especially in the field of clinical research. The public are being urged to become more well-informed and to ask their doctors about taking part in clinical trials. A key finding of a report from the Association of Medical Research Charities was that all published scientific papers would benefit from having a section in plain English. Researchers running a clinical trial are expected to provide a summary of their intended research at various stages of the research process. However, there is evidence that existing summaries are of variable length and quality and not always in plain English. As a result, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) commissioned a review of the guidance that is available to researchers. However, recent initiatives demonstrate that there are still a number of challenges in making current research both accessible and understandable by prospective participants. BioMed Central also has a number of ongoing initiatives involving trial registration services and journals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 21%
Social Sciences 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 24%