↓ Skip to main content

Monitoring activities of teenagers to comprehend their habits: study protocol for a mixed-methods cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monitoring activities of teenagers to comprehend their habits: study protocol for a mixed-methods cohort study
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-649
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathieu Bélanger, Isabelle Caissie, Jacinthe Beauchamp, Jennifer O’Loughlin, Catherine Sabiston, Michelina Mancuso

Abstract

Efforts to increase physical activity in youth need to consider which activities are most likely to be sustained over time in order to promote lifelong participation in physical activity. The Monitoring Activities of Teenagers to Comprehend their Habits (MATCH) study is a prospective cohort study that uses quantitative and qualitative methods to develop new knowledge on the sustainability of specific physical activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 113 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 18 16%
Social Sciences 18 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 13%
Psychology 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 36 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#13,154,684
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,228
of 14,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,618
of 194,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#157
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.