↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association mapping of frost tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide association mapping of frost tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-424
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Visioni, Alessandro Tondelli, Enrico Francia, Alexander Pswarayi, Marcos Malosetti, Joanne Russell, William Thomas, Robbie Waugh, Nicola Pecchioni, Ignacio Romagosa, Jordi Comadran

Abstract

Frost tolerance is a key trait with economic and agronomic importance in barley because it is a major component of winter hardiness, and therefore limits the geographical distribution of the crop and the effective transfer of quality traits between spring and winter crop types. Three main frost tolerance QTL (Fr-H1, Fr-H2 and Fr-H3) have been identified from bi-parental genetic mapping but it can be argued that those mapping populations only capture a portion of the genetic diversity of the species. A genetically broad dataset consisting of 184 genotypes, representative of the barley gene pool cultivated in the Mediterranean basin over an extended time period, was genotyped with 1536 SNP markers. Frost tolerance phenotype scores were collected from two trial sites, Foradada (Spain) and Fiorenzuola (Italy) and combined with the genotypic data in genome wide association analyses (GWAS) using Eigenstrat and kinship approaches to account for population structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Benin 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 118 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 27%
Researcher 34 27%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Engineering 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,386,934
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#4,979
of 10,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,553
of 196,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#55
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,626 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.