You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhancing the reporting of implementation research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-017-0546-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul M. Wilson, Anne Sales, Michel Wensing, Gregory A. Aarons, Signe Flottorp, Liz Glidewell, Alison Hutchinson, Justin Presseau, Anne Rogers, Nick Sevdalis, Janet Squires, Sharon Straus |
| Abstract |
In the 10 years since the inception of Implementation Science, we have witnessed a continued rise in the number of submissions received, reflecting the continued global interest in methods to enhance the uptake of research findings into healthcare practice and policy. We receive over 750 submissions annually, and there is now a large gap between what is submitted and what gets published. In this editorial, we restate the journal scope and current boundaries. We also identify some specific reporting issues that if addressed will help enhance the scientific reporting quality and transparency of the manuscripts we receive. We hope that this editorial acts as a further guide to researchers seeking to publish their work in Implementation Science. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 134 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 19% |
| United States | 20 | 15% |
| Canada | 14 | 10% |
| Ireland | 6 | 4% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 51% |
| Scientists | 53 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Psychology | 11 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#526,148
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#36
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,461
of 426,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.