↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors of the stigma towards psychiatric patients among primary healthcare workers in China: a county study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk factors of the stigma towards psychiatric patients among primary healthcare workers in China: a county study
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12888-017-1215-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Wang, Xiaohua Wang, Weijun Zhang, Xiaoyun Liang, Donghua Tian, Zhiyong Qu

Abstract

Attitude towards psychiatric patients among healthcare workers has an impact on quality of medical care and rehabilitation of patients. In China, primary healthcare workers play an important role in mental health care, but little is known about the attitude of them towards psychiatric patients. This study aims to examine the risk factors associated with stigma among primary healthcare workers in West China. This cross-sectional study randomly recruited 395 primary healthcare workers in Mianzhu County, China. Data were collected via self-reported questionnaires. Descriptive analyses, bivariate analyses, and hierarchical linear regressions were performed by SPSS 17.0 to test the factors that accounted for the variation of stigma towards psychiatric patients. Several risk factors were confirmed, including the satisfaction of income, work experience in psychiatric/ psychological departments, rehabilitation of patients, contact quality, and the attitude of mass media. However, demographic factors, the rest of work-related factors, and contact frequency might not be related with primary healthcare workers' attitude towards psychiatric patients. The findings suggested that the quality of contact between primary healthcare workers and psychiatric patients be enhanced in order to decrease the stigma of healthcare staff. On-the-job training and institutional medical education needs a further exploration and development.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Psychology 11 14%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 21 28%