↓ Skip to main content

Primum non nocere—first do no harm. And then feed peanut

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primum non nocere—first do no harm. And then feed peanut
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13223-017-0180-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyla Jade Hildebrand, Elissa Michele Abrams, Timothy K. Vander Leek, Julia Elizabeth Mainwaring Upton, Douglas P. Mack, Linda Kirste, Christine McCusker, Sandeep Kapur

Abstract

The Addendum Guidelines for the Prevention of Peanut Allergy in the United States-Report of the NIAID-Sponsored Expert Panel were developed to build on previous food allergy guidelines after several key studies demonstrated the benefit of early introduction of allergenic foods. These landmark studies including the Learning Early about Peanut (LEAP), LEAP-On and Enquiring about Tolerance trials created a paradigm shift in food allergy prevention. The "take home" messages of this guideline include that peanut should be introduced early in the first year of life, and for the majority of infants, peanut can be introduced at home. The only group of infants for which medical assessment is recommended is those with severe eczema, egg allergy or both. Here we summarize the Guideline recommendations, endorsed by the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and highlight important aspects relevant to Canadian practitioners.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,478,517
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#75
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,201
of 424,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.