You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rethinking psychiatry with OMICS science in the age of personalized P5 medicine: ready for psychiatome?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1747-5341-8-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola Luigi Bragazzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Psychology | 7 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,268,452
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#88
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,973
of 207,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.