You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation phase of a multicentre prehospital telemedicine system to support paramedics: feasibility and possible limitations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1757-7241-21-54 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastian Bergrath, Michael Czaplik, Rolf Rossaint, Frederik Hirsch, Stefan Kurt Beckers, Bernd Valentin, Daniel Wielpütz, Marie-Thérèse Schneiders, Jörg Christian Brokmann |
| Abstract |
Legal regulations often limit the medical care that paramedics can provide. Telemedical solutions could overcome these limitations by remotely providing expert support. Therefore, a mobile telemedicine system to support paramedics was developed. During the implementation phase of this system in four German emergency medical services (EMS), the feasibility and possible limitations of this system were evaluated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 19% |
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 23% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,245,294
of 24,256,961 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#400
of 1,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,373
of 198,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,256,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.