You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding peer support: a qualitative interview study of doctors one year after seeking support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-023-09312-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingrid Marie Taxt Horne, Frode Veggeland, Fredrik Bååthe, Christina Drewes, Karin Isaksson Rø |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 19% |
| Psychology | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,597,286
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,038
of 8,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,802
of 424,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#38
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.