You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Traditional japanese diet score and the sustainable development goals by a global comparative ecological study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-024-00936-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomoko Imai, Keiko Miyamoto, Ayako Sezaki, Fumiya Kawase, Yoshiro Shirai, Chisato Abe, Masayo Sanada, Ayaka Inden, Norie Sugihara, Toshie Honda, Yuta Sumikama, Saya Nosaka, Hiroshi Shimokata |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,535,603
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#576
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,187
of 253,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.