You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From little things big things grow: enhancement of an acoustic telemetry network to monitor broad-scale movements of marine species along Australia’s east coast
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Movement Ecology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40462-024-00468-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Barnett, Fabrice R. A. Jaine, Stacy L. Bierwagen, Nicolas Lubitz, Kátya Abrantes, Michelle R. Heupel, Rob Harcourt, Charlie Huveneers, Ross G. Dwyer, Vinay Udyawer, Colin A. Simpfendorfer, Ingo B. Miller, Tracey Scott-Holland, Carley S. Kilpatrick, Samuel M Williams, Daniel Smith, Christine L. Dudgeon, Andrew S. Hoey, Richard Fitzpatrick, Felicity E. Osborne, Amy F. Smoothey, Paul A. Butcher, Marcus Sheaves, Eric E. Fisher, Mark Svaikauskas, Megan Ellis, Shiori Kanno, Benjamin J. Cresswell, Nicole Flint, Asia O. Armstrong, Kathy A. Townsend, Jonathan D. Mitchell, Matthew Campbell, Victor M. Peddemors, Johan A. Gustafson, Leanne M. Currey-Randall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 10 | 36% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
| Scientists | 10 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,200,068
of 25,934,224 outputs
Outputs from Movement Ecology
#93
of 403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,622
of 236,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Ecology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.