You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A first-in-human clinical study of laparoscopic autologous myoblast sheet transplantation to prevent delayed perforation after duodenal endoscopic mucosal dissection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13287-024-03730-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kengo Kanetaka, Yasuhiro Maruya, Miki Higashi, Shun Yamaguchi, Ryo Matsumoto, Shinichiro Kobayashi, Keiichi Hashiguchi, Fumiya Oohashi, Masaki Matsumura, Takahiro Naka, Yusuke Sakai, Kazuhiko Nakao, Shigeru Miyagawa, Susumu Eguchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,187,137
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#732
of 2,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,896
of 171,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.