↓ Skip to main content

Reasons for and against receiving influenza vaccination in a working age population in Japan: a national cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reasons for and against receiving influenza vaccination in a working age population in Japan: a national cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-647
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsubasa Iwasa, Koji Wada

Abstract

To improve influenza vaccination coverage in the working age population, it is necessary to understand the current status and awareness of influenza vaccination. This study aimed to determine influenza vaccination coverage in Japan and reasons for receiving the vaccine or not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 25%
Student > Bachelor 8 22%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 36%
Psychology 7 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,046,479
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,239
of 14,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,899
of 194,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#93
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.