↓ Skip to main content

Reasons for and against receiving influenza vaccination in a working age population in Japan: a national cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reasons for and against receiving influenza vaccination in a working age population in Japan: a national cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-647
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsubasa Iwasa, Koji Wada

Abstract

To improve influenza vaccination coverage in the working age population, it is necessary to understand the current status and awareness of influenza vaccination. This study aimed to determine influenza vaccination coverage in Japan and reasons for receiving the vaccine or not.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 23%
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 34%
Psychology 8 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,634,197
of 21,347,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,904
of 13,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,026
of 174,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,347,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.