↓ Skip to main content

Operation of a brain-computer interface walking simulator for individuals with spinal cord injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Operation of a brain-computer interface walking simulator for individuals with spinal cord injury
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-10-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine E King, Po T Wang, Luis A Chui, An H Do, Zoran Nenadic

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) can leave the affected individuals with paraparesis or paraplegia, thus rendering them unable to ambulate. Since there are currently no restorative treatments for this population, novel approaches such as brain-controlled prostheses have been sought. Our recent studies show that a brain-computer interface (BCI) can be used to control ambulation within a virtual reality environment (VRE), suggesting that a BCI-controlled lower extremity prosthesis for ambulation may be feasible. However, the operability of our BCI has not yet been tested in a SCI population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 282 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Researcher 33 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 78 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 50 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 12%
Neuroscience 27 9%
Psychology 24 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 90 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2013.
All research outputs
#12,685,629
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#566
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,141
of 172,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.