You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Association between In Utero arsenic exposure, placental gene expression, and infant birth weight: a US birth cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Health, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-12-58 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dennis Liang Fei, Devin C Koestler, Zhigang Li, Camilla Giambelli, Avencia Sanchez-Mejias, Julie A Gosse, Carmen J Marsit, Margaret R Karagas, David J Robbins |
Abstract |
Epidemiologic studies and animal models suggest that in utero arsenic exposure affects fetal health, with a negative association between maternal arsenic ingestion and infant birth weight often observed. However, the molecular mechanisms for this association remain elusive. In the present study, we aimed to increase our understanding of the impact of low-dose arsenic exposure on fetal health by identifying possible arsenic-associated fetal tissue biomarkers in a cohort of pregnant women exposed to arsenic at low levels. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 50% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 64 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 19% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2014.
All research outputs
#1,604,824
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#323
of 1,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,556
of 193,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.