You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Validation of the English version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cats
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Veterinary Research, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-6148-9-143 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juliana T Brondani, Khursheed R Mama, Stelio P L Luna, Bonnie D Wright, Sirirat Niyom, Jennifer Ambrosio, Pamela R Vogel, Carlos R Padovani |
Abstract |
A scale validated in one language is not automatically valid in another language or culture. The purpose of this study was to validate the English version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale (MCPS) to assess postoperative pain in cats. The English version was developed using translation, back-translation, and review by individuals with expertise in feline pain management. In sequence, validity and reliability tests were performed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 191 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
Researcher | 15 | 8% |
Other | 15 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
Other | 46 | 24% |
Unknown | 48 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 80 | 41% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Unknown | 52 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,731,188
of 24,525,534 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#181
of 3,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,462
of 176,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.