↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the English version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cats

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the English version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cats
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-9-143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana T Brondani, Khursheed R Mama, Stelio P L Luna, Bonnie D Wright, Sirirat Niyom, Jennifer Ambrosio, Pamela R Vogel, Carlos R Padovani

Abstract

A scale validated in one language is not automatically valid in another language or culture. The purpose of this study was to validate the English version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale (MCPS) to assess postoperative pain in cats. The English version was developed using translation, back-translation, and review by individuals with expertise in feline pain management. In sequence, validity and reliability tests were performed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 191 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 46 24%
Unknown 48 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 80 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 52 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,731,188
of 24,525,534 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#181
of 3,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,462
of 176,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.