↓ Skip to main content

The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities update (2015)

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities update (2015)
Published in
Trials, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-1788-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Gargon, P. R. Williamson, D. G. Altman, J. M. Blazeby, S. Tunis, M. Clarke

Abstract

This letter describes the substantial activity on the Core Outcome Measure in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) website in 2015, updating our earlier progress reports for the period from the launch of the COMET website and database in August 2011 to December 2014. As in previous years, 2015 saw further increases in the annual number of visits to the website, the number of pages viewed and the number of searches undertaken. The sustained growth in use of the website and database suggests that COMET is continuing to gain interest and prominence, and that the resources are useful to people interested in the development of core outcome sets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 30%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 24%