↓ Skip to main content

A prospective randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing medial and lateral entry pinning with lateral entry pinning for percutaneous fixation of displaced extension type supracondylar fractures…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A prospective randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing medial and lateral entry pinning with lateral entry pinning for percutaneous fixation of displaced extension type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1749-799x-7-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abhijan Maity, Debasish Saha, Debasis Sinha Roy

Abstract

To compare the efficacy of medial and lateral entry pinning with lateral entry pinning for percutaneous fixation of displaced (Gartland type II and type III) extension type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#1,142
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,329
of 258,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.