↓ Skip to main content

Genetic variation and relationships of seven sturgeon species and ten interspecific hybrids

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic variation and relationships of seven sturgeon species and ten interspecific hybrids
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-45-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaomin Zhang, Wenhua Wu, Linmiao Li, Xufa Ma, Jinping Chen

Abstract

Sturgeon cultivation is important for both industry and aquaculture in China. To date, more than 17 species or strains have been farmed for fillets and caviar production. Crossbreeding among different sturgeon species is frequent and the F2 hybrids are fertile. However, large-scale farming can have negative impacts on wild populations i.e. escape of exotic sturgeons and must be taken into consideration. Escape of exotic sturgeons can cause severe ecological problems, including threatening native sturgeon species once the exotic varieties become established or hybridize with native individuals. However, little is known about their genetic resources and variation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Unspecified 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#550
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,713
of 207,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.