You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of robotic guidance on the coordination of locomotion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-79 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan C Moreno, Filipe Barroso, Dario Farina, Leonardo Gizzi, Cristina Santos, Marco Molinari, José L Pons |
| Abstract |
Functional integration of motor activity patterns enables the production of coordinated movements, such as walking. The activation of muscles by weightened summation of activation signals has been demonstrated to represent the spatiotemporal components that determine motor behavior during walking. Exoskeleton robotic devices are now often used in the rehabilitation practice to assist physical therapy of individuals with neurological disorders. These devices are used to promote motor recovery by providing guidance force to the patients. The guidance should in principle lead to a muscle coordination similar to physiological human walking. However, the influence of robotic devices on locomotor patterns needs still to be characterized. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of force guidance and gait speed on the modular organization of walking in a group of eight healthy subjects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 53 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,755,656
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#779
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,073
of 196,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.