You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Robotic pancreatic surgery is no substitute for experience and clinical judgment: an initial experience and literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7819-11-160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Wayne, Justin Steele, Mazen Iskandar, Avram Cooperman |
| Abstract |
Robotic pancreatic surgery offers technical advantages, and has found applications across many surgical specialties. We report an initial experience of 12 distal pancreatic resections for benign tumors, from an established pancreatic center with previous general and biliary laparoscopic experience. 7/12 were females, the mean age was 55.5 years; and the lesions included 8 distal Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumors, 1 insulinoma and in 3 a nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumor. All operations were done between 90 and 180 minutes,and blood loss and hospital stay were minimal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 18% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2013.
All research outputs
#17,691,177
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#872
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,018
of 196,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.