You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sp1- and Krüppel-like transcription factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2003-4-2-206 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanna Kaczynski, Tiffany Cook, Raul Urrutia |
| Abstract |
Sp1-like proteins and Krüppel-like factors (KLFs) are highly related zinc-finger proteins that are important components of the eukaryotic cellular transcriptional machinery. By regulating the expression of a large number of genes that have GC-rich promoters, Sp1-like/KLF transcription regulators may take part in virtually all facets of cellular function, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and neoplastic transformation. Individual members of the Sp1-like/KLF family can function as activators or repressors depending on which promoter they bind and the coregulators with which they interact. A long-standing research aim has been to define the mechanisms by which Sp1-like factors and KLFs regulate gene expression and cellular function in a cell- and promoter-specific manner. Most members of this family have been identified in mammals, with at least 21 Sp1-like/KLF proteins encoded in the human genome, and members are also found in frogs, worms and flies. Sp1-like/KLF proteins have highly conserved carboxy-terminal zinc-finger domains that function in DNA binding. The amino terminus, containing the transcription activation domain, can vary significantly between family members. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 252 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 21% |
| Researcher | 54 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 66 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 40 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,489
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,085
of 140,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.