You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance – a randomized, controlled clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Head & Face Medicine, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-160x-9-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tobias Ficnar, Claudius Middelberg, Bernd Rademacher, Stefan Hessling, Raphael Koch, Ludger Figgener |
| Abstract |
Painful temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are usually treated with physiotherapy, self-exercises, medication-based therapy and splint therapy. For splint therapy different types of splints are available. Therefore this randomized controlled study compared the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance (SB) with a laboratory-made occlusal appliance (SS) in myofascial pain patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 51 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,711
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#184
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,750
of 280,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them