↓ Skip to main content

Frequency of nut consumption and mortality risk in the PREDIMED nutrition intervention trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
232 X users
facebook
42 Facebook pages
googleplus
12 Google+ users
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frequency of nut consumption and mortality risk in the PREDIMED nutrition intervention trial
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Guasch-Ferré, Mònica Bulló, Miguel Ángel Martínez-González, Emilio Ros, Dolores Corella, Ramon Estruch, Montserrat Fitó, Fernando Arós, Julia Wärnberg, Miquel Fiol, José Lapetra, Ernest Vinyoles, Rosa Maria Lamuela-Raventós, Lluís Serra-Majem, Xavier Pintó, Valentina Ruiz-Gutiérrez, Josep Basora, Jordi Salas-Salvadó

Abstract

Prospective studies in non-Mediterranean populations have consistently related increasing nut consumption to lower coronary heart disease mortality. A small protective effect on all-cause and cancer mortality has also been suggested. To examine the association between frequency of nut consumption and mortality in individuals at high cardiovascular risk from Spain, a Mediterranean country with a relatively high average nut intake per person.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 232 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 7 3%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 263 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 16%
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Other 19 7%
Other 64 23%
Unknown 56 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Unspecified 5 2%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 65 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 533. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#47,328
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#58
of 4,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246
of 207,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#4
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.