You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of the relationships between social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in health: a contribution to understanding the psychosocial pathway of health inequalities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-12-54 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleonora P Uphoff, Kate E Pickett, Baltica Cabieses, Neil Small, John Wright |
| Abstract |
Recent research on health inequalities moves beyond illustrating the importance of psychosocial factors for health to a more in-depth study of the specific psychosocial pathways involved. Social capital is a concept that captures both a buffer function of the social environment on health, as well as potential negative effects arising from social inequality and exclusion. This systematic review assesses the current evidence, and identifies gaps in knowledge, on the associations and interactions between social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| Chile | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 611 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 116 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 100 | 16% |
| Researcher | 81 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 45 | 7% |
| Other | 114 | 18% |
| Unknown | 125 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 147 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 15% |
| Psychology | 58 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 85 | 14% |
| Unknown | 171 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,246,729
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#159
of 2,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,399
of 208,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.