You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Medicinal plants from swidden fallows and sacred forest of the Karen and the Lawa in Thailand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-9-44 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Auemporn Junsongduang, Henrik Balslev, Angkhana Inta, Arunothai Jampeetong, Prasit Wangpakapattanawong |
| Abstract |
Many ecosystem services provided by forests are important for the livelihoods of indigenous people. Sacred forests are used for traditional practices by the ethnic minorities in northern Thailand and they protect these forests that are important for their culture and daily life. Swidden fallow fields are a dominant feature of the agricultural farming landscapes in the region. In this study we evaluate and compare the importance of swidden fallow fields and sacred forests as providers of medicinal plants among the Karen and Lawa ethnic minorities in northern Thailand. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 28 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,392,943
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#234
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,603
of 196,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.