↓ Skip to main content

High-fidelity national carbon mapping for resource management and REDD+

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 238)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-fidelity national carbon mapping for resource management and REDD+
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-0680-8-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory P Asner, Joseph Mascaro, Christopher Anderson, David E Knapp, Roberta E Martin, Ty Kennedy-Bowdoin, Michiel van Breugel, Stuart Davies, Jefferson S Hall, Helene C Muller-Landau, Catherine Potvin, Wayne Sousa, Joseph Wright, Eldridge Bermingham

Abstract

High fidelity carbon mapping has the potential to greatly advance national resource management and to encourage international action toward climate change mitigation. However, carbon inventories based on field plots alone cannot capture the heterogeneity of carbon stocks, and thus remote sensing-assisted approaches are critically important to carbon mapping at regional to global scales. We advanced a high-resolution, national-scale carbon mapping approach applied to the Republic of Panama - one of the first UN REDD + partner countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 259 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 19%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 16 6%
Other 55 20%
Unknown 43 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 95 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 15%
Engineering 9 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 64 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,175,230
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#25
of 238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,356
of 195,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them