You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2013 and ‘DSMitis’: implications for the Journal of Eating Disorders and its authors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Eating Disorders, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2050-2974-2-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Phillipa Hay, Stephen Touyz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 19% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 19% |
| Psychology | 4 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,204,941
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#305
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,840
of 307,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.