↓ Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary approach to the demography of Jamaica

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interdisciplinary approach to the demography of Jamaica
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael L Deason, Antonio Salas, Simon P Newman, Vincent A Macaulay, Errol Y st A Morrison, Yannis P Pitsiladis

Abstract

The trans-Atlantic slave trade dramatically changed the demographic makeup of the New World, with varying regions of the African coast exploited differently over roughly a 400 year period. When compared to the discrete mitochondrial haplotype distribution of historically appropriate source populations, the unique distribution within a specific source population can prove insightful in estimating the contribution of each population. Here, we analyzed the first hypervariable region of mitochondrial DNA in a sample from the Caribbean island of Jamaica and compared it to aggregated populations in Africa divided according to historiographically defined segments of the continent's coastline. The results from these admixture procedures were then compared to the wealth of historic knowledge surrounding the disembarkation of Africans on the island.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Lecturer 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,767,434
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#418
of 3,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,489
of 169,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.