You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-14-220 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jette Led Sørensen, Cees Van der Vleuten, Jane Lindschou, Christian Gluud, Doris Østergaard, Vicki LeBlanc, Marianne Johansen, Kim Ekelund, Charlotte Krebs Albrechtsen, Berit Woetman Pedersen, Hanne Kjærgaard, Pia Weikop, Bent Ottesen |
| Abstract |
Unexpected obstetric emergencies threaten the safety of pregnant women. As emergencies are rare, they are difficult to learn. Therefore, simulation-based medical education (SBME) seems relevant. In non-systematic reviews on SBME, medical simulation has been suggested to be associated with improved learner outcomes. However, many questions on how SBME can be optimized remain unanswered. One unresolved issue is how 'in situ simulation' (ISS) versus 'off site simulation' (OSS) impact learning. ISS means simulation-based training in the actual patient care unit (in other words, the labor room and operating room). OSS means training in facilities away from the actual patient care unit, either at a simulation centre or in hospital rooms that have been set up for this purpose. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 306 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 13% |
| Researcher | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 78 | 25% |
| Unknown | 58 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 13% |
| Psychology | 24 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 73 | 23% |