You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Safety and efficacy of noninvasive ventilation in patients with blunt chest trauma: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc12821 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Abhijit Duggal, Pablo Perez, Eyal Golan, Lorraine Tremblay, Tasnim Sinuff |
Abstract |
This systematic review looks at the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV), inclusive of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) and continuous positive pressure ventilation (CPAP), in patients with chest trauma to determine its safety and clinical efficacy in patients with blunt chest trauma who are at high risk of acute lung injury (ALI) and respiratory failure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 144 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 23 | 15% |
Researcher | 20 | 13% |
Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 11% |
Other | 22 | 15% |
Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 64% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2013.
All research outputs
#14,784,344
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,874
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,174
of 209,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#54
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.