You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SISH/CISH or qPCR as alternative techniques to FISH for determination of HER2 amplification status on breast tumors core needle biopsies: a multicenter experience based on 840 cases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-13-351 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jocelyne Jacquemier, Frédérique Spyratos, Benjamin Esterni, Marie-Joëlle Mozziconacci, Martine Antoine, Laurent Arnould, Sarab Lizard, Philippe Bertheau, Jacqueline Lehmann-Che, Cécile Blanc Fournier, Sophie Krieger, Frédéric Bibeau, Pierre-Jean Lamy, Marie Pierre Chenard, Michèle Legrain, Jean-Marc Guinebretière, Delphine Loussouarn, Gaëtan MacGrogan, Isabelle Hostein, Marie Christine Mathieu, Ludovic Lacroix, Alexander Valent, Yves Marie Robin, Françoise Revillion, Magali Lacroix Triki, Aline Seaume, Anne Vincent Salomon, Patricia de Cremoux, Geneviève Portefaix, Luc Xerri, Sophie Vacher, Ivan Bièche, Frédérique Penault-Llorca |
| Abstract |
Until now, FISH has been the gold standard technique to identify HER2 amplification status in ambiguous cases of breast cancer. Alternative techniques have been developed to increase the capacities of investigating HER2 amplification status. The aims of this multicenter study in a large series of breast cancer patients were to prospectively compare the level of performance of CISH, SISH, and qPCR alternative techniques on paraffin-embedded core biopsies with "gold standard FISH" for evaluation of HER2 amplification status. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2016.
All research outputs
#13,386,934
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,971
of 8,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,109
of 197,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#30
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.