You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exercise rehabilitation for patients with critical illness: a randomized controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc12835 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Denehy, Elizabeth H Skinner, Lara Edbrooke, Kimberley Haines, Stephen Warrillow, Graeme Hawthorne, Karla Gough, Steven Vander Hoorn, Meg E Morris, Sue Berney |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this trial was to investigate the effectiveness of an exercise rehabilitation program commencing during ICU admission and continuing into the outpatient setting compared with usual care on physical function and health-related quality of life in ICU survivors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 23% |
| Japan | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 429 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 78 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 10% |
| Other | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 8% |
| Researcher | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 84 | 19% |
| Unknown | 121 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 102 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 6% |
| Unknown | 145 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,477,684
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,296
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,449
of 209,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.