You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rapid and dynamic subcellular reorganization following mechanical stimulation of Arabidopsisepidermal cells mimics responses to fungal and oomycete attack
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-8-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrienne R Hardham, Daigo Takemoto, Rosemary G White |
| Abstract |
Plant cells respond to the presence of potential fungal or oomycete pathogens by mounting a basal defence response that involves aggregation of cytoplasm, reorganization of cytoskeletal, endomembrane and other cell components and development of cell wall appositions beneath the infection site. This response is induced by non-adapted, avirulent and virulent pathogens alike, and in the majority of cases achieves penetration resistance against the microorganism on the plant surface. To explore the nature of signals that trigger this subcellular response and to determine the timing of its induction, we have monitored the reorganization of GFP-tagged actin, microtubules, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and peroxisomes in Arabidopsis plants - after touching the epidermal surface with a microneedle. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 23% |
| Researcher | 36 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 97 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Linguistics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#16,061,963
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#1,282
of 3,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,525
of 97,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.