↓ Skip to main content

Use of stepwise lactate kinetics-oriented hemodynamic therapy could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
65 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of stepwise lactate kinetics-oriented hemodynamic therapy could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia
Published in
Critical Care, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1617-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiang Zhou, Dawei Liu, Longxiang Su, Bo Yao, Yun Long, Xiaoting Wang, Wenzhao Chai, Na Cui, Hao Wang, Xi Rui

Abstract

Setting lactate kinetics at >30% might improve the clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia. The aim of this study was to explore the outcome benefits of stepwise lactate kinetics vs central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2)-oriented hemodynamic therapy at 6 h as the protocol goal during early resuscitation. The relevant parameters and adverse events after different targets in 360 randomly assigned patients with sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia were recorded and compared. Heart rate (HR) at 48 h in the ScvO2 group was higher than in the lactate kinetics group (105 ± 19 bpm vs 99 ± 20 bpm, P = 0.040). The liquid balance at 4 h, 12 h, and 24 h in the lactate kinetics group was larger than in the ScvO2 group (1535 (1271-1778) ml vs 826 (631-1219) ml, P < 0.001; 1688 (1173-1923) ml vs 1277 (962 - 1588) ml, P <0.001; and 1510 (904-2087) ml vs 1236 (740-1808) ml, P = 0.005), respectively. Mortality was higher in the ScvO2 group (27.9% vs 18.3%, P = 0.033), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of stay in the ICU or mechanical ventilation. In terms of new onset organ dysfunction, there was a significant difference between the two groups in total bilirubin at 48 h and 72 h. Based on the 60-day survival curves, there was significantly more mortality in the ScvO2 group than in the lactate kinetics group (X (2) = 4.133, P = 0.042). In addition, fewer adverse events occurred in the lactate kinetics group. Stepwise lactate kinetics-oriented hemodynamic therapy can reduce mortality in patients with sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia compared with ScvO2-oriented therapy. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry, NCT02566460 . Registered on 26 September 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 12%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 31 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,044,771
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#820
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,004
of 319,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#14
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.